Illogicopedia talk:About
From Illogicopedia
What does "actively going against a decision" mean and what justifies warning someone not to? Does it mean editing to put something back after admins have removed it repeatedly for a clearly stated reason, or does it mean something else? I think the language is not clear enough, and calling the admins "werewolves" might be nonsensical but nonsense should be what the rules govern, the rules shouldn't be nonsense in themselves. --Nerd42 03:03, 3 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)
- "Does it mean editing to put something back after admins have removed it repeatedly for a clearly stated reason, or does it mean something else?" For example; that's the basic idea. Feel free to rewrite it in a clearer way. (or I can do so, later) --The Divine Fluffalizer 10:50, 3 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)
Here here! I think ^^^^^ is right seeing as the rules are only ever going to be the logical and clearly stated part ofe wiki. A good foundation is what will keep the wiki going for ages. -- 06:27, 3 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May I just say...
...even though I am speaking for myself, what a brilliant and original idea for a wiki this actually is. Credit to Nerd and Seppy (mainly Nerd)... if it weren't for that damn Uncle Pete we would be world famous by now.
A nice little eagle boost for you all. Toodlepip. -- 
Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:09, 29 Yoon 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lol
At the bit about drugs! -- Hindleyak ( Blab | Blog ) 17:39, 20 Arply 2009 (UTC)
- ...however there is one major flaw - the article does not take into account legal drugs like Paracetamol and paint thinner. --
Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:05, 11 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Seriously
Nobody reads these. They are now whittled down to the point where they don't represent the wiki anymore. The same goes for that "what is ?pedia about". You are answering questions nobody ever asked. --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 
20:15, 15 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
- So? It doesn't matter. --Nerd42 21:18, 15 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
- Yes it does matter. We want our policy and help pages to be short and straightforward. When I was a n00b, I never read any policy pages that were longer than...oh...a couple paragraphs. The longer and more convuluted our policy pages are, the higher the change that they'll go completely unread. --THE 22:40, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
- What really makes illogicopedia is the unwritten ethic that can't be put into words. Call it the ?spirit it's like, the cammaradere, and just general feel to the wiki. Or at least it was (depending on opinion) anyway, we could sum most of these up in small sentences, and, it'd be better if it was the community/admins choosing these sentences. 22:45, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
- Brilliant THE 22:48, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
- What really makes illogicopedia is the unwritten ethic that can't be put into words. Call it the ?spirit it's like, the cammaradere, and just general feel to the wiki. Or at least it was (depending on opinion) anyway, we could sum most of these up in small sentences, and, it'd be better if it was the community/admins choosing these sentences. 22:45, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
- Yes it does matter. We want our policy and help pages to be short and straightforward. When I was a n00b, I never read any policy pages that were longer than...oh...a couple paragraphs. The longer and more convuluted our policy pages are, the higher the change that they'll go completely unread. --THE 22:40, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
