From Illogicopedia
- This is for articles; see also: Illogicopedia:Featured images
| This section is Logical; it is meant to be. Prepare to be bored.
|
Sensible Section
|
This page displays of all the current votes. See Forum:Department of Limelight for a summary index of nominated articles and the other non-article-vote-related things handled there.
Previous article nominations can be found here - or separately, the featured, the ones waiting to be featured and the ones that failed. This category tree also contains all nominated pages and their votes. (useful for checking that the VFF template has been added/removed correctly)
Nomination
Enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Nominate", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry. If the page already exists, you can either try to fix the "Revoting" option or give up.
Revolting
If you think a previously failed nomination has a chance at winning a revote, you can re-nominate it below. (note that repeated renomination of a page without good reason is frowned upon – a review of the article is recommended) Once again, enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Revote", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry.
Current votes
| VOTING REGULATIONS
|
|
There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics:
- Users are permitted one vote each.
- Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment.
- Remember to sign and to update the vote count.
- Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against".
- Take care not to overdo self-nomination.
- If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags.
- Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged.
Click here for more details
|
|
| Score: 5 (5-0)
|
Nomination by ~ 20:51, 11 Serpeniver 2011
|
| For:
|
- Red furry awesome ate my researchists. On that not, self-nom and for because I can. ...I can, right? ~
20:51, 11 Serpeniver 2011
- Da. I have spent way too much time hating on Athy's articles. They are better than mine, as they don't mention Rick Parry, Glenn Beck, or any of them every other sentence. She can haz feature. I don't deserve itz.--Colonel Sanders 03:36, 12 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
- Fortress of solitude. Mm-hmm. Yep. ~
[TheHappySpacemanDan the Hedgehog] talk • stalk • block • articles 21:29, 09/12/2011
- Ford (actually a pretty good card) - NotReallyMyUsername t c u 2012-02-02T23:12
- But of course - A distinct lack of smell.
23:08, 18 Arche 2012 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
|
| Comments:
|
|
| Score: 0 (0-0)
|
Nomination by 99.239.209.51 20:53, 7 Arche 2012 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
|
| Against:
|
|
| Comments:
|
|
| Score: 4 (4-0)
|
Nomination by Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 13:26, 14 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- Nom and for. Great piece of nostalgic observation, which I'm a sucker for. And it's from 2008! Why did it take me so long to find it? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 13:26, 14 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
- For. I had quite a lot of these when I was a kid. Never thought that bands played the songs live on the radio, though (auto-tune proved that to me). Also, the line about how nobody gives a **** about you except for your friends is also disqualified if you are an Internet celebrity, meme, famed troll, etc. etc. etc. Of course, that's why we're Illogicopedia, not the late ED. ~Runner-Up
13:55, 01/21/2012
- Gratuitous For - 'nuff said. Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 03:45, 24 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
- For - NotReallyMyUsername t c u 2012-02-02T23:11
|
| Against:
|
|
| Comments:
|
An unofficial protest against the integrity of this article, on the grounds that it is unnecessarily logical. Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 03:45, 24 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
|
| Score: -1 (1-2)
|
Nomination by Island Monkey - Throw a banana 16:45, 12 Novelniver 2011 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
|
| Against:
|
- Neigh - Not front page caliber, more like a .606 Rhino rifle actually. I recommend immediate submission to Uncle Pete for immediate rejection. It'll build your edit count. Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 04:12, 24 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
- It was between against and leaving a comment. I went against because I've tried the whole advertisement/scam thing, and it seemed sort of funny, but it never struck a chord with any of the populace, at least when it came to VFF. Not saying that it couldn't make it, if well executed it can take my pants off in an erotic, illogical rage. Nonetheless, the jokes (?) seemed to flop like a freshly caught fish, and the content itself went over my head like a bridge I just went under. —rms talk 01:32, 1 Farbleum 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- I actually really like it but can't decide whether it deserves to be on the front page. Rather than say nothing, I thought I'd drop this comment in case someone decided to expand upon the concept... -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:51, 4 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
|
| Score: 3 (7-4)
|
Nomination by T3 21:57, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- For - Pickle honorable mention. I enjoyed it. --T3 21:57, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- For. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia
22:07, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- Fur It has lots of cows, the title contains the word "murder", it is an interesting contrastual nonsense against A murder of crows and I love the author. Quick, find me another monkey! Gruntled AKA Reverend Zim_ulator AKA Grunteloons - Exchange ideas 13:42, 13 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- Formaldehyde. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 13:45, 13 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- Ya man. ~
16:03, 08/15/2011
- Forks. Lots of them. Also, funny article.--
(Talkies) (artikles) 08:23, 21 Ditzimber 2011 (UTC)
- Yush. - NotReallyMyUsername t c u 16:38, 12 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- No. This piece reflects a sociogeopolitical idea that is infested with liberal bias invented by George Soros and the Tides Foundation along with Van Jones, Barack Obama, Taylor Swift, and MoveOn.org. Therefore, this piece is null and void and is not deserving of this little cute thing you call an award. This piece is an effective way of ensuring vegetarianism, homosexuality, South Parking, unorthodox views, eating a bunch of raw sewage, stealing the Krabby Patty secret formula, fattening up on mushrooms, watching World War II documentaries and Full House, causing the murders of many Telletubbies, Melanieism, atheism and obesity, and other such Satanic and unhealthy measures. It is the result of corporate interest, wealth on the part of talking vegetables, and other external forces. Andy Griffith also has stated this is a mess that should never appear on the main page of this here establishment. A reasonable Republican might run in the opposite direction. Good luck finding one.You are the worst person in the world! Time marches on! You sir, are a disgrace for nomming this crap. Resign, sir! Eventually, we will forget it because time marches on! Good night, and good luck.--Colonel Sanders 22:15, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- I do hope you actually have a reason for voting against, because if not, I do believe you should resign, sir. --T3 22:35, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, I'll do the Olbermann stealing here. Wasn't that good enough? It is much longer than most negative votes.--Colonel Sanders 22:45, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- But seriously, it doesn't have the oomph that a feature needs.--Colonel Sanders 22:48, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- One of the most interesting 'No' votes I've ever read. It's nearly an article itself. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia
13:49, 13 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- I actually really liked the beginning and the image caption, and had the rest of the article been that way, then I would have given this a hardy for, however, I felt it got weaker with the story part and ended a little short of what I wanted. Of course, this was made with the Pickle in mind, so. It's a nice little poiker but just fades a little towards the back half, sorry mates. —rms talk 17:34, 14 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- Narrow Against falls a little short of being feature-worthy and perhaps could do with a little more expansion. No doubt a very good article though, and should it have some additions, this vote will move up a box.--Ben Blade 10:21, 17 Octodest 2011 (UTC)
- No. Meahhh...no...
Island Monkey - Throw a banana 07:38, 1 Farbleum 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- C'mon, either nominate this or make this lose already! This has been voting since August. ~Runner-Up
00:29, 01/25/2012
|
| Score: 3 (5-2)
|
Nomination by --Colonel Sanders 12:03, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- Semi Self-nom and for-Gomphog suggested this be nommed, so I nommed it since he was too lazy. It's time to tell the truth about this fascist.--Colonel Sanders 12:03, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC)
- For, because I like the way this is written, and it brings back memories of Animal Crossing from years ago. Also because I added a sentence.--Ben Blade 15:35, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC)
- Yea. Take down the fraudulent capitalists!--Conservatism XI X MMXI
- Add an infobox and you have a for from me. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:34, 10 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
- Fur - "Tell us the story of how God was denied His fruity cereal." Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 03:36, 24 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
|
| Comments:
|
stealing mah jokes, eh Dan? The Berty Island Monkey was mine first! And hating on mah artikles? Write one that's better, m'boy! Govenrment skools dont teech pepl howz 2 rite.--Colonel Sanders 01:48, 23 Octodest 2011 (UTC)
- First of all, I seriously had no idea you started that joke. My deepest apologies. Have a banana bat'leth. Secondly, AHEM. SEE POODLE AND CHEESES, THE LATTER OF WHICH GOT FEATURED. THAT IS ALL. ~[ths] Keeper of the Bloodwine
22:44, 11/04/2011
- No worries, mon.--Colonel Sanders 00:00, 5 Novelniver 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, foo... you ate the cheese, didn't you? There's no other way all could be forgiven... ~
00:46, 5 Novelniver 2011
- My eyes! My EYES!!! This was painful to look at. So painful, I didn't even read it. Make it pretty! —rms talk 05:01, 15 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
- That's partially the result of Hindley's template thingy. Fix the template. I can't.--Colonel Sanders 14:01, 15 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)
- Should be fixed; we're just waiting on the server to notice that the css changed. ~
18:03, 15 Jeremy 2012
- Nevermind; is fixed. I forgot we're not WMF. ~
18:13, 15 Jeremy 2012
|
| Score: 4 (5-1)
|
Nomination by Gruntled AKA Monsignor Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 00:42, 2 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- Fur - It's fairly well illogical, plus it's an inside inside joke with obtuse references to two too users too. *keeps hearing Alan Rickmans voice in his head* Gruntled AKA Monsignor Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 00:42, 2 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
- Why not? It's not like some masterpiece out of nowhere will fly in my face and look great on that template. Monsignor Peaches writes better stuff than me.--Colonel Sanders 02:58, 2 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
- Masterpiece. I'm biased, though. ~
13:13, 2 Serpeniver 2011
- Obvious for. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia
15:21, 2 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
- For. -–—
03:46, 4 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- Against. Illogicallity is excellent. But it's short, and I don't know, it doesn't quite have the zing of a feature. It's short, it's cool, it's a handy little article (not to mention the smackin' image), but does it belong on the front page? I say nay, it just lacks the theme/joke I associate with a featured article. Hmph. There's me voting against everything again. —rms talk 03:12, 14 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
|