Illogicopedia:Votes for Feature

From Illogicopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This is for articles; see also: Illogicopedia:Featured images
Sencible stamp.png
  This section is Logical, it is meant to be. Prepare to be bored.  
  Sensible Section  

This page displays of all the current votes. See Forum:Department of Limelight for a summary index of nominated articles and the other non-article-vote-related things handled there.

Previous article nominations can be found here - or separately, the featured, the ones waiting to be featured and the ones that failed. This category tree also contains all nominated pages and their votes. (useful for checking that the VFF template has been added/removed correctly)

Nomination

Enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Nominate", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry. If the page already exists, see "Revoting" below.

Revolting

If you think a previously failed nomination has a chance at winning a revote, you can re-nominate it below. (note that repeated renomination of a page without good reason is frowned upon – a review of the article is recommended) Once again, enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Revote", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry.

Current votes

VOTING REGULATIONS
There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics:
  • Users are permitted one vote each.
  • IP votes only count for 1/2 a vote.
  • Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment.
  • Remember to sign and to update the vote count.
  • Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against".
  • Take care not to overdo self-nomination.
  • If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags.
  • Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged.
Click here for more details





[edit] Advertising Epilepsy (vote)

Score: 4 (4-0) Nomination by —rms talk 04:47, 20 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
For:
  • Nomnfor pretty funny stuff, thought it was delicious. Also, nice first testimonial, yes? —rms talk 04:47, 20 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
  • For - Because I'm the Paula Abdul of VFF. --T3canolis 02:26, 21 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
    • D'oh —rms talk 03:58, 21 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
  • Why not. CamelToe 05:16, 21 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
  • fur --THE 04:00, 1 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:


[edit] Cooties (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0) Nomination by ForgotXMyXPassword 02:01, 31 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:
  • Stain could use some images, and some cleanup. The Thomas Jefferson section seemed weak. Give this sucker a slight facelift, and yeah, I'm yours. —rms talk 04:25, 31 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)


[edit] Computer (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0) Nomination by Newforum.png Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 12:04, 18 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
For:
  • A rather intriguing and neat little article honed by numerous Illogicopedians. Good stuff, with a bit of randomness thrown in for good measure. -- Newforum.png Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 12:04, 18 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, always liked this one. —rms talk 17:17, 18 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:


[edit] Hexicorn (vote)

Score: 0 (0-0) Nomination by (ƒî)» 14:53, 6 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
For:

Creit laya, deiayhn aisai. --(ƒî)» 14:53, 6 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Against:
Comments:


[edit] Bi-Polar Bear (vote)

Score: 2.01 (3-0.99) Nomination by T3canolis 20:08, 5 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
For:
  • Mon and rof - There is a whole slew of people on it's talk page wanting VFF and it was good and... Just vote. --T3canolis 20:08, 5 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
  • AGAINST, wait, that should read as 'for'. Damm Babelfish >_> 92.30.70.86 21:30, 5 Jumbly 2010 (UTC) (TESTOSTEREICH)
  • Seventeen Right, Dunc, babelfish is layme (That was supposed to be 'sure') —rms talk 01:57, 6 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
Against:
  • <3 thunder --(ƒî)» 03:12, 6 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)
Comments:


[edit] book (vote)

Score: 3 (3-0) Nomination by —rms talk 21:37, 6 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
For:
  • Nomination and For vote a nice piece written more than likely by Hindelyak, seems like his type of article. Also, these should hopefully get votes going —rms talk 21:37, 6 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
  • For - a nice little article. --T3canolis 01:46, 7 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
  • Go for it CamelToe 23:12, 7 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:
Personal tools
Article management